Whenever we see the proposition of a dichotomy - only two forces or reasons for a complex event - no matter how well argued that proposition is, we must ask whether there is a possibility for a third force and what’s the reason for its omission. This is a very lengthy expose focusing on European revolutions yet it completely ignores a country that escaped all of the revolutions of 19th century despite harboring “revolutionaries” from every country imaginable. A country where the most radical ideas about class struggle was born, which immediately translated these ideas into all European languages but its own (surprising fact!) Surprising omission or redirection?
Oh my God why can't you people just type what you mean rather than blow smoke up your arse talking around it. You're not being transgressive, just obtuse
Hello! Please let me know where I can download the book. INTRODUCTION of EUROPEAN CIVIL WAR 1917-1945
Whenever we see the proposition of a dichotomy - only two forces or reasons for a complex event - no matter how well argued that proposition is, we must ask whether there is a possibility for a third force and what’s the reason for its omission. This is a very lengthy expose focusing on European revolutions yet it completely ignores a country that escaped all of the revolutions of 19th century despite harboring “revolutionaries” from every country imaginable. A country where the most radical ideas about class struggle was born, which immediately translated these ideas into all European languages but its own (surprising fact!) Surprising omission or redirection?
Oh my God why can't you people just type what you mean rather than blow smoke up your arse talking around it. You're not being transgressive, just obtuse
Where would be fun in that? The mention of class struggle should be a big enough hint.
NPC-ass dialogue tree
You, you know many words but few facts. Hardly what we call knowledge. It can be frustrating.